Trump to Share New List of Potential Supreme Court Nominees; Would They Remain Conservative Once on Court?

It’s an interesting time for President Trump to be unveiling a new list of conservative jurists that he would consider as nominees should a position on the U.S. Supreme Court become available. The list will come out just days after the Supreme Court, in a majority opinion written by Trump-appointed Neil Gorsuch, ruled in favor of considering sexual orientation a protected class under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.

The 6-3 ruling created controversy because Gorsuch had previously written that laws should be interpreted using plain language considering the times in which they were passed, which is a conservative, contextualist view.  However, the opinion he wrote argued for something that seems unlikely to have crossed the minds of legislators in the early 1960s, whether or not a person could be fired simply for being gay.

Trump tweeted:

“Based on decisions being rendered now, this list is more important than ever before.”

The issue underscores a simple truism. People are still people. You never know what they are going to do.  As for Constitutional questions, Americans have been fighting for more than 100 years about whether courts should be “finding” new rights in existing laws, or holding to original meanings and requiring Congress to update or change any laws that need attention given current norms.

See Comments (2)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Comments (2)

  1. susan howden

    It is critical that conservative judges be appointed. B.Hussein Obama left many positions unfilled for TRUMP to fill! How lucky was that for conservatism. I would imagine that there is a listing of judges which have to be vetted and I don’t think that anyone can predict how a judge will vote once in a position. This is one of those leave it at God’s doorstep and hope for the best.

  2. ClaudiA

    The Civil Rights Act is not based on ‘LIFESTYLE” choices! It is based on the fundamentals of HUMANKIND, not what you do in your bedroom. A person’s choice of what they do in the privacy of their own home is not civil rights, nor is it a doctrine of belief. Something socially acceptable? Maybe in some places, just as nude beaches are acceptable in some places. This is not a subject our Government should have anything to do with, nor spend taxpayer funds on promoting, discussing, ruling or making any law regarding a lifestyle behavior, unless it is criminal.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!